Dental Publication / Article Details |
Mandibular Block Autografts for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Author(s):
Date Added:
1/1/2005
|
Summary:
Reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies requires bone augmentation before implant placement. Osseous defects occur as a result of trauma, prolonged edentulism, congenital anomalies, periodontal disease, and infection, and they often require hard and soft tissue reconstruction. Autogenous bone grafts have been used for many years for ridge augmentation and are still considered the gold standard for jaw reconstruction. The use of autogenous bone grafts with osseointegrated implants originally was discussed by Bra°nemark and colleagues, who often used the iliac crest as the donor site. Other external donor sites include calvarium, rib, and tibia. For repair of most localized alveolar defects, however, block bone grafts from the symphysis and ramus buccal shelf offer advantages over iliac crest grafts, including close proximity of donor and recipient sites, convenient surgical access, decreased donor site morbidity, and decreased cost. This article reviews indications, limitations, presurgical evaluation, surgical protocol, and complications associated with mandibular block autografts harvested from the symphysis and ramus buccal shelf for alveolar ridge augmentation. The author draws from 14 years of experience with more than 500 mandibular block autografts.
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Flapless Postextraction Socket Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone: Part 1. The Effect of Bone Grafting and/or Provisional Restoration on Facial-Palatal Ridge Dimensional Change
The dental literature has reportted vertical soft tissue changes that can occur with immediate implant placement, bone grafting, and provisional restoration ranging from a gain or loss of 1.0mm. However, little is known of the effects of facial-palatal collapse of the ridge due to these clinical procedures. Based upon treatment modalities rendered, an ensuing contour change can occur with significant negative esthetic consequences. The results of a retrospective clinical cohort study evaluating the change in horizontal ridge dimension associated with implant placement in anterior postextraction sockets are presented for four treatment groups. Therefore, it is recommended to place a bone graft and contoured healing abutment or provisional restoration at the time of flapless postextraction socket implant placement.
Author(s): |
Dennis P. Tarnow, DDS;Stephen J. Chu, DMD, MSD, CDT;Maurice Salama, DMD;Christian F.J. Stappert, DDS, MS, PhD, Priv-Doz;Henry Salama, DMD;David Garber, DMD;Guido O. Sarnachiaro, DDS; Evangelina Sarnachiaro, DDS; Sergio Luis Gotta, DDS; Hanae Saito, DDS, MS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Videos |
|
|
Innovative Autogenous Bone Collector
Dr. Maurice Salama demonstrates a new and innovative tool for efficiently and safely harvesting autogenous bone to enhance augmentation procedures.
Presented By:: |
Maurice Salama, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Growth Factor Mediated Regenerative Therapies
In this very technical and scientific presentation, Dr. Joseph Choukroun, a physician and researcher from France, describes the benefits of Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) in wound healing. He emphasizes the effect of PRF on the two essential factors of wound healing which are new vessels and cells in surgical sites like extraction sockets, sinus augmentation and more.
Presented By:: |
Joseph Choukroun, MD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Advances in Bone Augmentation and Related Armamentarium
Bone augmentation is one of the most important and most difficult steps in implantology. Also the standard techniques used are very sensitive, bound to a certain experience from a large number of surgeries and have a high learning curve. Despite these facts augmentation procedures are often the least planned part of the therapy and based on poor diagnostics. Due to a lack of standardized protocols these procedures are often performed by the surgeons favorite method instead of the most indicated one. It is astonishing , that for the implant placement most advanced techniques are used - cone beam, navigation templates etc. - whereas augmentation procedures are often based on a high percentage of improvisation.
Presented By:: |
Dr. Jan Kielhorn |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Autologous Bone vs. Bioactive Modifiers/BMP-2: A Clinical Update in Bone Regeneration - Part 2 of 2
There are several techniques and materials available for implant site development. The choice may depend on a number of factors including size of the defect, osseous morphology, costs and surgeon or patient preferences. Autogenous bone has long been considered the gold standard of graft materials. The trend today is to reduce patient morbidity but still provide predictable outcomes. This lecture will discuss the use of autogenous bone versus using bioactive modifiers such as platelet concentrates, rhPDGF and rhBMP-2 as replacement for the need to harvest bone.
Presented By:: |
Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Eduication Credit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Tissue Engineering and Platelet Derived Growth Factors: Evidence Based Therapy
Platelet derived growth factors are now routinely utilized in reconstructive therapy. This presentation describes very detailed and evidence based guidelines for clinicians interested in enhancing their abilities in tissue engineering, especially as it relates to bone augmentation.
Presented By:: |
Joseph Choukroun, MD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Osseointegration & Augmentation
A 4 part course worth 1 CEU.
Presented By:: |
Maurice Salama, DMD;Ziv Mazor, DMD;Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, PhD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|