Video Details
|
Autologous Bone vs. Bioactive Modifiers/BMP-2: A Clinical Update in Bone Regeneration - Part 1 of 2
Description:
There are several techniques and materials available for implant site development. The choice may depend on a number of factors including size of the defect, osseous morphology, costs and surgeon or patient preferences. Autogenous bone has long been considered the gold standard of graft materials. The trend today is to reduce patient morbidity but still provide predictable outcomes. This lecture will discuss the use of autogenous bone versus using bioactive modifiers such as platelet concentrates, rhPDGF and rhBMP-2 as replacement for the need to harvest bone.
Date Added:
2/20/2020
Author(s):
Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS
Dr. Craig M. Misch graduated from the University of Michigan School of Dentistry. He then received postgraduate certificates in prosthodontics and oral implantology as well a...
[read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Autologous Bone vs. Bioactive Modifiers/BMP-2: A Clinical Update in Bone Regeneration - Part 1 of 2
Questions & Comments
|
Patrick Sweeney - (5/14/2019 10:12 PM)
As always, I enjoyed hearing the scientific along with the clinical factors that create success in everyday practice. My two brothers and I owe our implant success to the Misch brothers completely. They both showed us the way to successful practices with minimal complication. Thank god we found his brother Carl and eventually Craig in the beginning of our search for a teacher in 1985.
|
Shahdad Ayoughi - (1/6/2019 5:03 PM)
As usual, great presentation. Thanks Craig.
|
Craig Misch - (1/5/2019 8:15 PM)
Thank you David for the endorsement of the lecture - I created it special for the Dental XP meeting at NYU and the XP community. I appreciate the kind words from Dr. Kher - it was definitely a labor of love! Part 2 is more entertaining, I agree : )
|
UDATTA KHER - (1/4/2019 1:58 AM)
I had the privilege of watching this presentation at the XP NYU symposium. Craig I've heard you so often over the years. But that day you were sublime. I wish all clinicians practicing regenerative procedures watch this 2 part video.
|
David Garber - (1/2/2019 10:10 PM)
Dr Misch, this is a landmark elegant and sophisticated assessment of the convolution of regenerative techniques available to the clinician today .
An honest evaluative program presented with your unique ability to communicate the information and then the integrity we value.
An invaluable resource for clinically relevant decision making. . . . .
We ALL appreciate it no end .
|
Craig Misch - (12/28/2018 11:46 AM)
Thank you for the kind comments D. Silva. I enjoyed your lecture and was impressed with the beautiful cases you showed. i look forward to crossing our paths again soon.
|
Robert Silva - (12/27/2018 3:48 PM)
Dear prof Craig Misch,
I didn't have the opportunity to talk to you after our regeneration discussion following the lectures.
It was a real honor and privilege to share the podium with you.
You are not just a fantastic researcher, clinician and educator, but also a gentleman during the discussions.
I learned so much from you.
With all the respect
Robert
|
Maurice Salama - (12/22/2018 12:56 PM)
One of the best modern day REGENERATION presentations EVER performed. Lot's we know and lot's we do not know still...scientifically based, THANK YOU!!!
|
Related Videos |
|
|
Autologous Bone vs. Bioactive Modifiers/BMP-2: A Clinical Update in Bone Regeneration - Part 2
There are several techniques and materials available for implant site development. The choice may depend on a number of factors including size of the defect, osseous morphology, costs and surgeon or patient preferences. Autogenous bone has long been considered the gold standard of graft materials. The trend today is to reduce patient morbidity but still provide predictable outcomes. This lecture will discuss the use of autogenous bone versus using bioactive modifiers such as platelet concentrates, rhPDGF and rhBMP-2 as replacement for the need to harvest bone.
Presented By:: |
Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Bio-Surgery; Tips for More Biological and Prosthodontic Approach
In oral rehabilitation, obtaining a good aesthetic outcome is no longer enough for our patients. It is imperative that these good results do prevail in time. The best way to achieve this goal, is to
correctly diagnose each individual clinical case, and to choose Biological tools and Biological treatment techniques, that respect our own physiology and Nature.
Through this lecture, the authors try to share a few Surgical and Prosthodontic Bio-tips in Implant Dentistry, that in a simple and predictable way, can lead us to a great long lasting aesthetic results.
Presented By:: |
Bernardo de Mira Corrêa, DDS, DMD;Filipe Lopes, DDS, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
ANYTIME Immediate Loading Utilizing a Minimally Invasive Approach in Posterior Maxilla
This lecture will highlight a modified approach to the management of the posterior maxilla using a minimally invasive approach to sinus lift and augmentation. It will also focus on a modified implant placement protocol for obtaining and maintaining the ideal primary and secondary stability for immediate loading in the maxillary unilateral posterior area. The long term clinical results of the over 97% success rate for that protocol will be shown.
In this lecture, new guidelines and factors for the successful anytime loading in the unilateral posterior maxilla will be discussed.
Presented By:: |
Young-Ku Heo, DDS, CAGS, MSD, PhD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Autologous Bone vs. Bioactive Modifiers/BMP-2: A Clinical Update in Bone Regeneration - Part 1 of 2
There are several techniques and materials available for implant site development. The choice may depend on a number of factors including size of the defect, osseous morphology, costs and surgeon or patient preferences. Autogenous bone has long been considered the gold standard of graft materials. The trend today is to reduce patient morbidity but still provide predictable outcomes. This lecture will discuss the use of autogenous bone versus using bioactive modifiers such as platelet concentrates, rhPDGF and rhBMP-2 as replacement for the need to harvest bone.
Presented By:: |
Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recombinant Platelet Derived Growth Factors in Regenerative Therapies: No Blood Required
This presentation will go into detail about the different types of growth factors, comparisons of other biologics such as PRP, PRF, rhPDGF, PDGF, Amnion tissue, Emdogain and how you can incorporate these into your practice to increase clinical success. Much emphasis on piblished literature review as well as clinical cases.
Presented By:: |
Samuel E. Lynch, DMD, DMSc;Robert A. Horowitz, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Long Term Follow-Up of Dental Implants Placed in Autologous Onlay Bone Graft
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of autologous intraoral onlay bone grafting (OBG) in correlation
with long-term survival rates of dental implants placed in the augmented bone. A retrospective study was conducted on 214 patients who received a total of 633 dental implants
placed in 224 autologous intraoral block OBG augmentations, combined with Bio-Oss – mixed with platelet-rich plasma
(PRP) and covered by platelet-poor plasma (PPP) – as scaffold, with a follow-up time up to 137 months. We suggest that augmentation of severely atrophied jaw bone through the placement of horizontal and/or vertical intraoral OBGs in combination with Bio-Oss saturated with PRP and covered by PPP should be considered a reliable, safe, and very effective surgical technique for obtaining high bone graft survival rate and high long-term implant
survival rate.
Author(s): |
Devorah Schwartz-Arad, DMD, PhD;Ronen Ofec, DMD, MSc; Galit Eliyahu, PhD; Angela Ruban, PhD; Nir Sterer, DMD, PhD |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconstruction of a Single-Tooth Traumatic Defect in the Anterior Maxilla Using the Khoury Bone Plate Graft
Trauma to teeth and the dentoalveolar process may result in a ridge defect that precludes straightforward implant
therapy of the patient. Typically bone and soft tissue augmentation of the area would first be needed to adequately
prepare the tissues for the implant and its restoration..Grafting of the site is substantially more difficult in cases where
the ridge also lacks adequate height, and techniques to recreate a bony envelope to apply guided bone regeneration
may be required. Moreover, defects in the anterior aesthetic zone that require both bone and soft tissue grafting and
a restoration that harmonizes the adjacent pink and white aesthetics may be an even more significant challenge to
the restorative team. Hereafter a case of trauma to an anterior maxillary tooth that saw destruction of the ridge is
presented, with the defect reconstructed to accommodate a functional and aesthetically pleasing implant supported
restoration.
Author(s): |
Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD, PhD;Jonathan Du Toit, BChD |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|